Yes, I am a nerd

Carrick-a-rede Well, if you own the Vogue Stitchionary: volume one - knit & purl and were a bit annoyed that a list of patterns wasn’t included, well you’re now in luck - the nerd that I am has created both an alphabetical list of all 265 stitch patterns, but also lists by the four chapters in the book. I was going to really go nerdy on you and do a proper index - you know, with categories like Flowers or Geometric shapes. I may still do this. Yes, I am a nerd. A library nerd. Anyway, download the index if you desire (it’s in PDF). I hope the editors don’t come after me. Or maybe they’ll hire me to do proper indexes for future printings and books.

Now for a strange question. I’ve looked at a lot of sock patterns lately and wondered about pattern instructions that I find confusing.

Many of these patterns (top down) have a repeating pattern around the leg. When the pattern gets to the heel, many of them suggest you do one of the following when it comes time to do the heel flap (for simplicity I will use 64 stitches across 4 needles):

A. Complete the last round of the pattern as usual then knit across 16 stitches on needle 1. Turn and purl back and continue onto needle 4 and purl 16 stitches so you have 32 stitches on one needle.

OR

B. Break the yarn once you’ve completed the last pattern round and reorganise your stitches so that you have the same 32 mentioned above on a single needle.

Now I am sure sometimes these options are the right options. For example, and I’m just guessing here since I haven’t knit patterns that do any of the following, if the pattern is to continue down the heel flap or the repeat would be offset otherwise. When I knit a sock, I finish that last pattern round and then start the heel flap by knitting the stitches off of needles 1 & 2 since it doesn’t matter if it’s needles 1 & 4 or 1 & 2 since the pattern repeats around the leg. Am I missing something by not doing A or B above? I honestly feel like I must be missing something to make it that tiny bit more complicated.

Oh well.

I think I might look at a new theme for my blog. And trying to figure out the code to clean up the archives ’cause that’s just making my head feel a little crazy looking at all those months. Or I might work on my Ms Marigold.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.librarygirl.co.uk/knits/2007/06/17/yes-i-am-a-nerd/trackback/

Comments

Wow - what a colossal effort! Thanks!

On the socks, B seems like bunk. Why would you want to break the yarn? And maybe A is about having the pattern repeat begin and end in a certain place. I think your way is easier!

I usually just work needles 1 and 2 for the heel, unless it would ruin the pattern, but if the pattern repeat runs all the way round the leg, I don’t see the point in 1 and 4. I suppose it is because the heel usually ‘ends’ in the middle after you’ve picked up the gusset sts, but what does it matter if the pattern works ok with it?

You’re welcome! It was pretty easy though - if I go super nerd and do a proper index then it will be more effort. And I am likely to go super nerd, just to warn you.

I agree re: B! I don’t want another end to weave in!

WOW! Finally, an index I can use . . . that’s why I rename my stitch patterns to reflect the mood I am in. Also, because Vogue lacks imagination and cheek.

For socks, I rarely if ever follow the pattern for the heels. I go with whatever worked last time or rejigger them for toe up. Of course, I also knit magic loop for just about every pattern. Sorry!

Ah no worries! I wasn’t planning on changing how I did things, but wondered why would someone want to break the yarn on a heel!? FEWER ends to weave is in is far more superior. I did try magic loop when I was doing two socks at once (the failed Falling Leaves) and part of why I switched to DPNs and finished up just the one sock was because I found magic loop to be so slow - especially w/ two socks on the go. Maybe I just never got the rhythm going…

Post a comment